Leadership Example

Leadership Example Leadership – Case Study Example Leadership al Affiliation: Leadership Summary Obama was able to use his personal appeal to win the general elections. To many, he isa leader who inspires hope to the oppressed and less fortunate in the society. He is a charismatic leader who has been able to navigate his way up despite the existence of successful people both in the organizations and the society at large. In order to understand in depth Obama as a charismatic leader, a study was conducted with the aim of investigating the discourse of charisma mainly in articles that were written six months before his election. The results indicated that the media played a significant role in creating an enthusiastic atmosphere around Obama. His charismatic characteristics were built around him as a person with major emphasis being on his life story, personality, and behaviour. Critical AnalysisElections in United States are closely contested with people looking at personal ideologies. However, in this election, there was a diversion from the norm. For many decades, marginalized groups especially blacks and non-natives felt that if one of their own was in the helm of power, they were likely to be recognized. However, Barrack Obama was able to create a link between the natives and non natives. His behaviours, personalities, and life story inspired both the oppressed and the local population. In addition, many looked at him as an inspirational leader. Nevertheless, his charismatic leadership when he was a senator of Illinois made people to feel that he has good leadership skills that can steer the country ahead. ImplicationsOne of the major implications of charismatic characteristics is that Obama was able to secure votes from both natives and non-natives. In addition, he has created hope to all people irrespective of their social status, religious background, and race. This has played a significant role in uniting people in the country. Leadership Example Leadership – Article Example Emily A. S.(2007) Taking responsibility. http www.what-are-good-leadership-skills.com/article-on-leadership-skills-08.html INTRODUCTION The article is about taking personal responsibility in any organization for success. Whenever a difficult situation comes we think that we are victim and start cursing the things that are beyond our control.The writer is of the view that the winners don’t have this attitude. Instead of being victim the winners find way to move forward, no matter how hard the situation is. This is what the personal responsibility is.FINDINGSThe author found that by taking personal responsibility for the things anybody can make a positive difference in life in terms of success. He demonstrates this by giving the example of sale girl who didn’t have the right shoe size for the author but instead of saying sorry he guided the author for other shops where he can find one, even she called those to make sure which one has this size to help author. By taking pe rsonal responsibility she made one loyal customer. In difficult situations stead of blaming we should ask question how we can make this situation better instead of waiting for others to come and rescue us. Author considers the employees, bosses, colleagues’ customers by relating the example of that sale girl. By taking personal responsibility we can make many loyal customers even if we are not sales person.CRITIQUEThe authorhas arranged the information in logical order where there are some points which are quite strong. These are as follows:â€Å"To believe you have no choice is to become a â€Å"victim† with no control†.Yes most of the time people think that easy solution is to get out of the situation by rationalizing our logic that it’s not my duty or fault. When we make our self-victim, we get out of the situation but the things are not corrected because we think that things are not under our control.â€Å"Stop whining or making excuses for why itâ⠂¬â„¢s not working out. Right now, take personal responsibility for moving things in the direction you want them to go.†The author is making the point that instead of blaming and excuses we should spend our time in searching for solution. So this relates that if we take the personal responsibility instead of being victim to move things forward we can make the difference.The article is short but there are fewer facts and figures. There are no facts that can support the main point and because of this the article evokes less.Beside thesethings there are some points in the article that need more explanation:â€Å"She did not have to do what she did, but because she took personal responsibility for satisfying my needs, she has now produced a loyal customer.†Although example is good but it does not clearly relates to the topic. If it wasn’t her job but she tried to do it, can she always do it? So should we always help others beyond the limit to make them our loyal cust omers? The example should be more elaborative to explain the concept of being victim in contrast to taking personal responsibility. Leadership Example Leadership – Coursework Example Leadership March 20, Leadership Leadership, the act or process of influencing people towards collective objectives, is an important element in an organizational set up. There are many leadership styles and contingency theory suggests that one leadership style may suit a given situation than are other leadership styles. Based on the theory, issues that pertain to use of force, unmotivated employees, and internal corruption would require different leadership styles to resolve. Authoritarian leadership style would be most effective in resolving use of force issues. The leadership approach focuses on control along an organizational structure, from top to bottom, and is based on allegiance to authority. It can therefore initiate or control issues that relate to force through an order that followers must obey. Authoritarian leadership focuses on immediate expectations, like controlling the use of force issues, and not behavioral effects on followers, though this identifies its weakness (Ne varez and Wood, 2010).Transformational leadership style, which focuses on empowerment and motivation among other issues, would be the most suitable for influencing unmotivated personnel. The leadership approach identifies followers’ needs and potentials, empowers followers, and meets their needs towards motivation. Meeting identified needs such as competence for performance would increase self worth, while offering rewards for performance would initiate positive attitude to initiate motivation among the personnel (Nevarez and Wood, 2010). Solving types of internal corruption would however require transformational leadership, a contingent approach that is based on positive or negative motivation. Many factors such as financial and behavioral factors affect desire to engage in corruption and integrating factors that counteract motivation to corruption such as sufficient remuneration, rewards for non-corrupt personnel, and punishment against corrupt personnel would help (Nevarez and Wood, 2010). Authoritarian leadership would therefore resolve use of force issues while transformational leadership would resolve unmotivated personnel issue and transactional leadership would resolve internal corruption issues.ReferencesNevarez, C. and Wood, J. (2010). Community college leadership and administration: Theory, practice, and change. New York, NY: Peter Lang.