The Biggest Policy Flaw - Free Essay Example

In the world that we live in today, the thought of gun violence has been a major issue for many years and has been a issue proposed by the people to the government. The government needs to have some type of gun control laws to fix the problem in America on gun related violence. Anti-gun activists believe that by taking guns away the crime rate will drop. They believe it is too dangerous for the public to have access to weapons. I believe that if certain new gun laws were to be enacted crime would most likely change. I dont disagree that we have we have problem but the way people want to fix it is what I feel is wrong. If guns were to be completely wiped out people would be left defenseless against criminals and would be losing their second amendment rights. Last year nearly 40 thousand people were killed by guns in the United States marking it the highest year of gun deaths in decades. Cable news Network or CNN found that the number of people killed by guns in 2017 shows a 10,000 person increase from 1999. The center for disease control or CDC confirmed with CNN that these death numbers are correct. Every day, 342 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, and police interventions. In 2017, nearly 109 people died every single day from gun violence, Director of Public Health Research Adelyn Allchin said in a statement. Gun violence is a epidemic that requires a solution, which is why we must immediately enact and implement evidence-based interventions such as permit-to-purchase policies and extreme risk laws. Allchin also stated that he thinks its time that our elected leaders at every level of government need to come together to make gun violence rare and abnormal. I believe that the second amendment was put in place for a reason and that right to own a gun should still be available. Many Americans are troubled everyday deciding whether keeping a gun in the home is a good idea. Keeping a gun in the home comes with some risks. There are many accidents occurring daily due to people not understanding how to handle guns. Many of us take that risk because the thought of protection outweighs the negatives. Our right of free choice needs to be preserved, and if the second amendment was taken away, our democratic society would be overruling us. Whenever I turn on the news the only thing that I seem to see are all the deadly crimes that are taking place across the country. I feel like we all want this to stop yet we are trying to take away a form of protection. If we dont have weapons to protect our personal safety then we might as well let people just kill us without a fight. I feel like we all want to have the ideal environment but we cant have that so called environment unless we feel safe and have a sense of protection. It is clear that crime is not going away anytime soon. Our federal government has put into effect many different forms of public policies to try and fix the problems that are widely known throughout the United States. The most important laws that are in effect right now are the federal laws prohibiting certain people from owning firearms. This law stop certain types of people from getting hold of a weapon. These people can range from having certain kinds of criminal records, mental illness, immigrants without legal status, veterans with dishonorable discharge and many more lost their right to own a firearm. Another example that branches of from the previous policy are the people selling the guns. The government takes many steps to make sure everything goes right and no laws are violated, or so they think. Federal law requires all weapons dealers to conduct a background check with the F.B.I to check if any red flags show up with the buyer. This may seem like a lot of safety but their are still problems with the system. People have found major loopholes and are using them to get weapons when they are not allowed too. The biggest policy flaw is that their are small-scale sellers, off branch people like small companies including many who do business at local gun shows,at these gun shows sellers are not required to do background checks on the buyers. This hole lets the sale of guns to be hidden and not seen by the government. Another example of a weapons policy that was put in place was that the federal government placed a ban on the sale of many types of assault rifles, but the law expired and has not been looked at sense. A few states have assault weapon bans of their own that remain in place. In fact, most gun controls exist at the level of the state, Laws on concealed carry weapons vary upon location widely too. Most states allow anyone who legally owns a gun to carry it openly, in public, without requiring a license or permit. Concealed carry in New York requires a permit like most states, these fluctuations show how federal and state rules can vary and show what can can result from different viewpoints. By many different sides of the argument, President Obama can be seen as one of the key players who was against guns and fought extensively for tougher gun control laws. was a key driver of the news and conversation on the topic. Overall, Obamas is widely known for taking many presidential actions such as announcement of a Gun Violence Task Force, this was to be lead by Joe Biden. The biggest pro gun player would be none other than the NRA or National Rifle Association. They fight for people to keep their second amendment right of the availability to keep and bear Arms. You often hear about the NRA today and that they are leading the fight to stop people and the government from taking away weapons. Despite the wide array of variation with gun control across the United States cities, there is no correlation between measurable impacts of violence levels found. The measurable information seems to be that with violence their is a higher frequency with which guns are used. Therefore, I think that the significance of some gun controls are definitely needed and recommended such as background checks, permits and licenses. We need these things because they put up some sort of security to block suspicious gun buyers, similar to having to going to hunter education classes before you can get a license. All in all I believe that certain types of gun control can be part of the solution to fixing violence related weapons problems in the United States. Through what I have shown I think that the United States needs more control on violence rather then weapons. I think that the idea of only guns being the problem is wrong and for many people thinking they are wrong too, but thats my opinion. I feel like if we want to have change we need to have longer prison terms, mandatory sentencing, and more use of stricter penalties. Even though Firearms have good and bad sides to it, you cant tell which side is wrong, this is why Gun Control is a ongoing topic still being discussed in our government today. The use of guns can save lives but can also can destroy ones life in a trigger pull. That fact brings people towards guns or scares people away from guns. In conclusion I think that that guns dont need be taken away. Its true that our laws regulate the sale and possession of other dangerous instrumentalities. The deaths from gun violence are close to the deaths from car accidents so one could say that cars dont kill people, people kill people.